Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:50:22 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 14:30:19, Richard Pijl wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 14:16:50, Joshua Haglund wrote: > >>On February 10, 2005 at 14:06:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>On February 10, 2005 at 13:40:04, Joshua Haglund wrote: >>> >>>>Can anyone tell me if Squash kibitzes too much or too little? >>>> >>>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 7 nodes: 1.78m eval: 0.03 time: 4.49 >>>>Squash(C) kibitzes: move g2g4 >>>> >>>>follow Squash >>>> >>>>Joshua Haglund >>>>toneewa@yahoo.com >>> >>>Most people output what you have, but with the entire PV. Zappa does score + >>>nps + depth + PV. Only the Australian programmers kibitz the entire contents of >>>the hash table every move. >>> >>>anthony >> >>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 3 nodes: 1.61k eval: 0.65 time: 0.00 >>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 4 nodes: 7.67k eval: 0.78 time: 0.02 >>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 5 nodes: 52.19k eval: 0.94 time: 0.13 >>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 6 nodes: 436.54k eval: 0.82 time: 1.13 >>Squash(C) kibitzes: move f3e5 >> >>I actually kibitz anything over 1k nodes, but the pv. Wouldn't humans cheat by >>using the pv? >> >>Joshua Haglund >>toneewa@yahoo.com > > >Baron doesn't kibitz when playing humans, but whispers. You receive a 'computer' >command during game start that allows you to make a difference. >In a few cases I noticed guest accounts following the Baron when playing a >human. In those cases, when I see it, I disable whispering by doing +alias >whisper xxx >But in most cases whispering makes following computer games a lot more >interesting >Richard. Movei is probably going to always kibitz I see no advantage in not doing it. If the opponent want to look at the line of movei to help him I have no problem with it because I do not see reason to care about Movei's rating on ICC. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.