Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 11:30:19 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 14:16:50, Joshua Haglund wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 14:06:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: > >>On February 10, 2005 at 13:40:04, Joshua Haglund wrote: >> >>>Can anyone tell me if Squash kibitzes too much or too little? >>> >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 7 nodes: 1.78m eval: 0.03 time: 4.49 >>>Squash(C) kibitzes: move g2g4 >>> >>>follow Squash >>> >>>Joshua Haglund >>>toneewa@yahoo.com >> >>Most people output what you have, but with the entire PV. Zappa does score + >>nps + depth + PV. Only the Australian programmers kibitz the entire contents of >>the hash table every move. >> >>anthony > >Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 3 nodes: 1.61k eval: 0.65 time: 0.00 >Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 4 nodes: 7.67k eval: 0.78 time: 0.02 >Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 5 nodes: 52.19k eval: 0.94 time: 0.13 >Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 6 nodes: 436.54k eval: 0.82 time: 1.13 >Squash(C) kibitzes: move f3e5 > >I actually kibitz anything over 1k nodes, but the pv. Wouldn't humans cheat by >using the pv? > >Joshua Haglund >toneewa@yahoo.com Baron doesn't kibitz when playing humans, but whispers. You receive a 'computer' command during game start that allows you to make a difference. In a few cases I noticed guest accounts following the Baron when playing a human. In those cases, when I see it, I disable whispering by doing +alias whisper xxx But in most cases whispering makes following computer games a lot more interesting Richard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.