Author: Joshua Haglund
Date: 11:16:50 02/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2005 at 14:06:28, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On February 10, 2005 at 13:40:04, Joshua Haglund wrote: > >>Can anyone tell me if Squash kibitzes too much or too little? >> >>Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 7 nodes: 1.78m eval: 0.03 time: 4.49 >>Squash(C) kibitzes: move g2g4 >> >>follow Squash >> >>Joshua Haglund >>toneewa@yahoo.com > >Most people output what you have, but with the entire PV. Zappa does score + >nps + depth + PV. Only the Australian programmers kibitz the entire contents of >the hash table every move. > >anthony Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 3 nodes: 1.61k eval: 0.65 time: 0.00 Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 4 nodes: 7.67k eval: 0.78 time: 0.02 Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 5 nodes: 52.19k eval: 0.94 time: 0.13 Squash(C) kibitzes: depth: 6 nodes: 436.54k eval: 0.82 time: 1.13 Squash(C) kibitzes: move f3e5 I actually kibitz anything over 1k nodes, but the pv. Wouldn't humans cheat by using the pv? Joshua Haglund toneewa@yahoo.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.