Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 18:02:03 02/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 26, 2005 at 16:01:01, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 26, 2005 at 11:55:04, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On February 26, 2005 at 09:48:44, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>And what about the cheating issue? As long as there is some >>>money involved one has to deal with it. >>>Are there only titled Humans allowed or just anyone? >>> >>>Guenther >> >>There are only titled humans allowed. >> >>This is the _exact_ reason it was decided that any individual can enter any >>program. With all Chessbase engines one has to either enter the moves by hand or >>use the winboard232d adapter. There would be virtually no way of telling if a >>person is using the correct engine. >> >>Allowing only titled human players cuts down the cheating big time. >> >>Peter > >I do not see how it can cut the cheating. >I do not see how you can prevent titled players to consult with a computer and >play advanced chess. > >When I think about it I expect some GM to play advanced chess and fight for the >first place inspite. > >He is going to lose some seconds of entering the moves to shredder9 in another >computer but it is not blitz so it is not very significant and if the position >is simple win he can stop it and win it by himself. > >Uri I don't think there are many gMs that practised in the art of playing advanced chess under time amd money pressure. I suspect that those who practiced advanced chess of play under the pressure of time and money wouldhave the greatest advantange. Of course, is there is GM who plays adance chess normally , he would have the greatest advantage.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.