Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 00:33:49 04/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On April 21, 2005 at 02:23:57, Ray Banks wrote:
>On April 21, 2005 at 02:15:36, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>> Hi Graham
>> Indeed: 90m+30s is an optimal time control and it
>> almost never happens (like at tc 40/120') that an
>> engine looses on time or gets in heavy time trouble
>> having only 0-1 seconds for each move up to the
>> end of the game (such games are terrible).
>> Kurt
>
>In my experience, I've never seen an engine lose on time at 40/120 (except for
>troubles with the GUI), and time-troubles are rare also.
Hi Ray
Well, my statement was somewhat misleading. It's very
very seldom that an engine loses on time with 40/120'
but often enough (in long games) the engines must move
within 1-3 seconds and this is something I do not like.
Such things of course never happen with TC 90m+30s
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.