Author: Klaus Wlotzka
Date: 01:04:26 05/16/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 18:48:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 16:26:40, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 15:48:36, gerold daniels wrote: >> >>>On May 15, 2005 at 13:07:32, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>> >>>>On May 15, 2005 at 12:32:26, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:59:16, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:42:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:21:21, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>If you haven't noticed it yet, Shredder 9 UCI doesn't play only in the >>>>>>>>CSS-computer rating list in another league. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>The difference of 100 Elo is relatively surely high. However, this lies well >>>>>>>>that "Shredder" likes short time controls. Furthermore "Shredder" copes with >>>>>>>>almost every opening system. Since there play at the CSS-computer rating list >>>>>>>>without books but with 10 modified SeE- positions, this yields broader >>>>>>>>advantages for "Shredder". >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Klaus Wlotzka >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I think that this test is more interesting for me >>>>>>>I am more interested in testing that is done in that way and I hope that they >>>>>>>will test next version of Movei. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>I do not understand how they choose engines to test(for example I see Jonny2.64 >>>>>>>that did not aualify and I do not see Jonny2.75). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Uri >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Hello Uri, >>>>>> >>>>>>a complete test run with an engine (480 games) lasts for always about 2 weeks. >>>>>>It can therefore last sometimes up to a year till it is a new version's turn >>>>>>again. So also at Jonny. >>>>>> >>>>>>I am testing "Spike 0.9a" at the moment, the following tests are planned after >>>>>>this: >>>>>> >>>>>>a.) Zappa 1.0 >>>>>>b.) Little Goliath Evolution >>>>>> >>>>>>I don't know whether Movei already plays so strongly to qualify for the >>>>>>CSS-computer rating list. I will look at the previous test reports more >>>>>>closely. >>>>>> >>>>>>Klaus >>>>> >>>>>In that case there is at least a month before testing Movei in case that you >>>>>test it after Little Goliath Evolution and I hope to have better Movei at that >>>>>time to be strong enough for the list. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>Hello Uri, >>>> >>>>I have looked at the rating list of "Leo Dijksman", "Movei" stands approximately >>>>on a level with "Little Goliath" there. I will parallel test Movei with "Little >>>>Goliath". This would be approximately in three weeks. I use a short test for it. >>>>The short test works so: >>>> >>>>To, in future, find possible new candidates faster who shows a sufficient >>>>playing strength for the qualification into the CSS-computer rating list new >>>>engines will unite short test undergone for the time being. The test candidate >>>>plays all 10 opening specification positions against all engines put in the >>>>current rating list after the following scheme: >>>> >>>>a.) opening specification positions 1-3 against the engines of rank 1-8 >>>>b.) opening specification positions 4-6 against the engines of rank 9-16 >>>>c.) opening specification positions 7-10 against the engines of rank 17-24 >>>> >>>>After this scheme a test run arises with altogether 168 games. This should reach >>>>to a first playing strength assessment. The candidate reaches a score in the >>>>area of the engine put on rank 25 becomes the test continual, otherwise a >>>>demolition is carried out. The results of the candidate are listed at >>>>demolition in the "eternal rating list". >>>> >>>> >>>>Therefore, if you still publish a more current engine within the next 3 weeks, >>>>then I would like to test the newer one of course. >>>> >>>>You also can send me an e-mail. You find my address here: >>>>http://www.wlotzka-computerschach.de/ >>>> >>>>Yours sincerely >>>> >>>>Klaus >>> >>>good afternoon Klaus. goliath LGE is a pretty strong engine it will certainly >>>be a good test for movei. >>> >>>gerold. >> >>Hi Gerold, >> >>The predecesser engine "Little Goliath revival" couldn't last in the >>CSS-computer rating list. I am curious whether with "Little Goliath evolution" >>an increase has been successful. I am curious also at "Movei" whether the >>qualification turns out well. >> >>Klaus > >I am sure of nothing but I guess that Movei of today is not strong enough to >qualify but 50 elo improvement in it are enough to qualify and I am optimistic >about improvements. > >Uri Hello Uri, think you it would be better that I still wait a little with the test? Klaus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.