Author: David Dahlem
Date: 08:26:52 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2005 at 11:24:37, F. Huber wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 11:17:31, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On May 21, 2005 at 11:11:14, F. Huber wrote: >> >>>On May 21, 2005 at 10:54:12, David Dahlem wrote: >>> >>>>What's the shortest forced mate from this position, and can any engine find it >>>>without tablebases? >>>> >>>>[D]2KB4/1P6/2k5/8/8/8/7b/8 w - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Dave >>> >>>Hi Dave, >>> >>>ChestUCI says, this is a #27! ;-) >>> >>>But to be serious: of course I´ve found this result in an online EGTB. >>> >>>Do you really believe, that _any_ engine could find this #27 _without_ >>>using tablebases?? >>> >>>Regards, >>>Franz. >> >>Thanks Franz >> >>I was curious if any engine was smart enough, that's why i asked. It looks like >>a simple position with only a few pieces, and engines are supposed to be smart. >>:-) >> >>I tried ChestUCI but ChestUCI has so many options, i was unable to find the >>correct option to use. :-) > >You´re right, it really has lots of options, but the most important one is >still missing: the ´Intelligent´ mode! :-) > >But I fear, you´ll have to wait for ChestUCI 10.0 for its implementation ... ;-) > >Regards, >Franz. Ok, i'll wait. How long do i have to wait for the 'Intelligent' mode? :-) Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.