Author: F. Huber
Date: 08:38:47 05/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2005 at 11:26:52, David Dahlem wrote: >On May 21, 2005 at 11:24:37, F. Huber wrote: > >>On May 21, 2005 at 11:17:31, David Dahlem wrote: >> >>>On May 21, 2005 at 11:11:14, F. Huber wrote: >>> >>>>On May 21, 2005 at 10:54:12, David Dahlem wrote: >>>> >>>>>What's the shortest forced mate from this position, and can any engine find it >>>>>without tablebases? >>>>> >>>>>[D]2KB4/1P6/2k5/8/8/8/7b/8 w - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>Dave >>>> >>>>Hi Dave, >>>> >>>>ChestUCI says, this is a #27! ;-) >>>> >>>>But to be serious: of course I´ve found this result in an online EGTB. >>>> >>>>Do you really believe, that _any_ engine could find this #27 _without_ >>>>using tablebases?? >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Franz. >>> >>>Thanks Franz >>> >>>I was curious if any engine was smart enough, that's why i asked. It looks like >>>a simple position with only a few pieces, and engines are supposed to be smart. >>>:-) >>> >>>I tried ChestUCI but ChestUCI has so many options, i was unable to find the >>>correct option to use. :-) >> >>You´re right, it really has lots of options, but the most important one is >>still missing: the ´Intelligent´ mode! :-) >> >>But I fear, you´ll have to wait for ChestUCI 10.0 for its implementation ... ;-) >> >>Regards, >>Franz. > >Ok, i'll wait. How long do i have to wait for the 'Intelligent' mode? :-) Counter-question: when do you plan to move into a retirement home? ;-) At this time it will be ready ... :) Regards, Franz.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.