Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 17:41:49 06/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2005 at 12:52:27, Sedat wrote:
>On June 09, 2005 at 11:54:26, James T. Walker wrote:
>
>>I have Shredder 9 UCI about 36 points higher than Shredder 8 (Chessbase/Classic)
>>in my Blitz database. Almost all games are 5/0 using auto232. Shredder 9 has
>>played over 600 games while Shredder 8 has played about 2600 games total. So
>>your inverted results are a bit puzzling to me also.
>>Jim
>
>For me its will be also a bit puzzling only,when you have played:
>-with the same conditions as in mine !!
I see nothing puzzling about it. Here we see an Elo difference of 33 points:
Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
01 Shredder 8 UCI : 2828 43 42 248 74.0 % 2646 19.8 %
02 Shredder 9 UCI : 2795 40 39 245 71.2 % 2638 27.3 %
and error bars athat are about 80 Elo wide. So Sedat's list does not decide a
winner between the two. Probably, the other lists don't either.
Couple that with the different conditions of the different tests, bolt on the
difference between opening books, and stir in CPU, hash file differences and
what have you.
Nothing surprising in the least (To me).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.