Author: Sedat
Date: 04:57:09 06/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 09, 2005 at 20:41:49, Dann Corbit wrote: >On June 09, 2005 at 12:52:27, Sedat wrote: > >>On June 09, 2005 at 11:54:26, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>I have Shredder 9 UCI about 36 points higher than Shredder 8 (Chessbase/Classic) >>>in my Blitz database. Almost all games are 5/0 using auto232. Shredder 9 has >>>played over 600 games while Shredder 8 has played about 2600 games total. So >>>your inverted results are a bit puzzling to me also. >>>Jim >> >>For me its will be also a bit puzzling only,when you have played: >>-with the same conditions as in mine !! > >I see nothing puzzling about it. Here we see an Elo difference of 33 points: > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > 01 Shredder 8 UCI : 2828 43 42 248 74.0 % 2646 19.8 % > 02 Shredder 9 UCI : 2795 40 39 245 71.2 % 2638 27.3 % > >and error bars athat are about 80 Elo wide. So Sedat's list does not decide a >winner between the two. Probably, the other lists don't either. > >Couple that with the different conditions of the different tests, bolt on the >difference between opening books, and stir in CPU, hash file differences and >what have you. > >Nothing surprising in the least (To me). Hello Dann, I absolutely agree with you Best, Sedat
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.