Author: Pallav Nawani
Date: 20:24:11 06/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2005 at 20:18:38, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Respect your example of the thief, again you fall, I am afraid, in a logic >trap, the so called petition of principle phallacy. A thief is a thief, caught >or not, right, but look at this: you are already calling and defining him as >thief from the beginning of the arument. You goe in circles. I do not agree, but I will not argue the point as I do not wish to continue the argument, and this is a good chance to terminate it. >In a personal area, It is not my intention to hurt you and in any case if you >felt so after my previous post, I am sorry. If you feel so, all is forgiven. >I even can concur with you that my joke was not that funny, its main sin. You should have said this in the beginning itself :) >Take into account my arguments with cold objetivity and dismiss the idea of an >ugly stabbing and all that. I know you were trying a joke, the allusion to making remarks behind the back was there to make you see the point that your joke was offensive (to me, and some others as well). I was not implying that you were out to backstab Adams or something. I hope this clarifies things from my side as well. With that, I will let the matter rest. Best regards, Pallav
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.