Author: Madhavan
Date: 08:13:13 07/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On July 15, 2005 at 10:57:20, William Penn wrote: >On July 15, 2005 at 10:35:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On July 15, 2005 at 10:31:33, Steve Glanzfeld wrote: >> >>>SSDF has been replaced by CEGT. They are quicker, include strong freeware, and >>>do not follow the 40/2h dogma. >>> >>>http://www.cegt.de/rangliste/cegtall.html >> >>But they use a GUI which handicaps a lot of engines. Results = worthless. >> >>-- >>GCP > >...and 40 moves in 40 minutes is too fast for reliability, IMHO, especially for >those who use the software in correspondence chess. The 40 moves in 2 hours used >by SSDF is best. Actually 40 moves in 40 days would be better! (24 hours per >move!!) >WP 40 moves in 40 days?Testers would do that?No way! What's the use of hooking engine to play correspondance chess? Chess engine's play + Time consumed + Result for 1 game delayed and lot other reason.I prefer network play rather than correspondance
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.