Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Is the SSDF taking a break from testing?

Author: William Penn

Date: 07:57:20 07/15/05

Go up one level in this thread

On July 15, 2005 at 10:35:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On July 15, 2005 at 10:31:33, Steve Glanzfeld wrote:
>
>>SSDF has been replaced by CEGT. They are quicker, include strong freeware, and
>>do not follow the 40/2h dogma.
>>
>>http://www.cegt.de/rangliste/cegtall.html
>
>But they use a GUI which handicaps a lot of engines. Results = worthless.
>
>--
>GCP

...and 40 moves in 40 minutes is too fast for reliability, IMHO, especially for
those who use the software in correspondence chess. The 40 moves in 2 hours used
by SSDF is best. Actually 40 moves in 40 days would be better! (24 hours per
move!!)
WP

• Re: Is the SSDF taking a break from testing? Pallav Nawani 09:45:04 07/15/05
  • Re: Is the SSDF taking a break from testing? Uri Blass 10:44:01 07/15/05
    • Re: Is the SSDF taking a break from testing? Pallav Nawani 21:38:19 07/15/05
      • Re: Is the SSDF taking a break from testing? Uri Blass 22:34:44 07/15/05
• Re: Is the SSDF taking a break from testing? Steve Glanzfeld 08:20:43 07/15/05
• Re: Is the SSDF taking a break from testing? Madhavan 08:13:13 07/15/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.