Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 14:21:46 08/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2005 at 13:04:02, Joachim Rang wrote: >On August 13, 2005 at 12:54:08, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On August 13, 2005 at 11:04:06, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>On August 13, 2005 at 10:47:18, Thomas Logan wrote: >>>> >>>>I think computer chess will experience a leap foward when the evaluation >>>>techniques of Fruit are incorporated into other engines >>>> >>>>Tom >>> >>>why people think that the evaluation of Fruit is so superior (Uri also believes >>>it). I think the evaluation is nothing fancy but not speculative (contrary to >>>many commercials which have speculative eval in order to let them find "human" >>>sacrifices). >>> >>>regards Joachim >> >>I don't know but something has to accout for Fruits playing strength and >>comments concerning search bugs in Fruit leads one to discount the idea it's >>strength resides in it's search >> >>Tom > > >Ah well search bugs ;-). Fabien himself mentioned this --- snip --- where did he mention that? /Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.