Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 16:51:57 08/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2005 at 17:21:46, Peter Fendrich wrote: >On August 13, 2005 at 13:04:02, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On August 13, 2005 at 12:54:08, Thomas Logan wrote: >> >>>On August 13, 2005 at 11:04:06, Joachim Rang wrote: >>> >>>>On August 13, 2005 at 10:47:18, Thomas Logan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>I think computer chess will experience a leap foward when the evaluation >>>>>techniques of Fruit are incorporated into other engines >>>>> >>>>>Tom >>>> >>>>why people think that the evaluation of Fruit is so superior (Uri also believes >>>>it). I think the evaluation is nothing fancy but not speculative (contrary to >>>>many commercials which have speculative eval in order to let them find "human" >>>>sacrifices). >>>> >>>>regards Joachim >>> >>>I don't know but something has to accout for Fruits playing strength and >>>comments concerning search bugs in Fruit leads one to discount the idea it's >>>strength resides in it's search >>> >>>Tom >> >> >>Ah well search bugs ;-). Fabien himself mentioned this >--- snip --- > >where did he mention that? > >/Peter in the readme of the official 2.1 release and here: http://talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?441032 regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.