Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WCCC-2005 : One Big Joke!

Author: George Speight

Date: 21:43:24 08/18/05

Go up one level in this thread


On August 19, 2005 at 00:29:12, Jonas Cohonas wrote:

>> If u notice, there would be no conflict with Bob, because in my scenario, he
>>would not have a program in the tourn. As for the Super Bowl, it is the only one
>>of the major 3 that is not the best of something. Therefore obviously the result
>>is not as credible. As for who agrees to show up, i was going on the assumption
>>that all WOULD AGREE to come. I did not just ride into town on the pumpkin
>>wagon, tho u all know alot more about this than I. I was merely picking what i
>>think are the top 12 and a guy who has the ability to run it right. I KNOW FULLY
>>WELL no format is perfect, but i think mine is close. I dont care if it takes 1
>>month, 2 months, or 3, if ur going to do it, do it right.   George
>
>It would be really nice if you bothered to format your text, your "one sentence"
>style is a bit annoying to read.
>
>What Dann is telling you is that no matter what format you choose, it will never
>be a replacement for a ratinglist and it will not be perfect.
>
>IMO if you have a beef with the format as it is, you are more than welcome to
>make your own and "show the world" how to run these kind of events in such a way
>that people will go;
> "Woooow i don't know how he did it, but in a one week tournament he managed to
>make the result as reliable as the SSDF ratinglist, he had fabulastic
>participants, no one have complained about it on CCC yet and never will! and the
>winner is unequivocally the best program in the world based on his magical
>event, oh and BTW nice pumpkin wagon he rides! yada yada blah blah."
>
>It is like with almost any other event, from soccer to chess, the winner is the
>winner of that particular event and the supporters has "bragging rights" untill
>next event, no one event will realistically reflect any real serious result,
>unless you are content with the authors sending their engines to some guy who
>the runs 10s of thousands of games for each engine against the others and report
>the results some 20 years later...
>
>I say, count your blessings and be grateful that someone even makes these
>events, i am sure they don't do it for the money...
>
>Regards
>Jonas
No one said anything was perfect. Not matter what u do, about half the people
wont be satisfied. Jut offering my opinion. As for my sentence structure, no
apologies here. Cant change the way i write. Read it or ignore it. Regards,
George



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.