Author: Uri Blass
Date: 20:00:13 08/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 20, 2005 at 21:35:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 20, 2005 at 21:09:17, Fabien Letouzey wrote: > >>On August 20, 2005 at 20:05:39, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >> >>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. Bb5+ Nc6 4. d4 cxd4 5. Qxd4 Bd7 6. Bxc6 Bxc6 7. c4 f5 8. >>>exf5 Qa5+ 9. Nc3 Qxf5 10. O-O Bxf3 11. gxf3 Qxf3 12. Re1 e5 13. Nb5 Nf6 14. >>>Nxd6+ Bxd6 15. Qxd6 Qg4+ 16. Kh1 Qf3+ 17. Kg1 Qg4+ 18. Kh1 Qf3+ 19. Kg1 1/2-1/2 >> >>>If you take a look at move no.9, then you might be able to find in the relevant >>>computer database that 9.Nc3 is much inferior (around 51%) to Nd2 (85% !). All >> >>Nc3 was chosen by search. In fact Fruit considered Nd2 for a long time, >>unfortunately switching for Nc3 at the last moment if I recall. >> >>Fabien. > >Fruit2.1 does not like Nc3 by search. > >Fruit - IsiChess, WCCC 13th Reykjavik 2005 >r3kbnr/pp2p1pp/2bp4/q4P2/2PQ4/5N2/PP3PPP/RNB1K2R w KQkq - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fruit 2.1: > >9.Nbd2 Qxf5 > ³ (-0.62) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >9.Nc3 Bxf3 10.gxf3 Qxf5 > = (-0.14) Depth: 1/4 00:00:00 >9.Nc3 Bxf3 10.gxf3 Qxf5 > = (-0.14) Depth: 2/7 00:00:00 >9.Nc3 Bxf3 10.gxf3 Qxf5 > = (-0.14) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 >9.Nc3 Qxf5 10.Nd5 Rc8 > = (0.07) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 >9.Nc3 Bxf3 10.gxf3 Qxf5 11.Qe4 Qd7 > = (-0.02) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 >9.Nc3 Nf6 10.Nh4 g6 11.Bg5 Bg7 > = (0.12) Depth: 6/16 00:00:00 38kN >9.Nc3 Qxf5 10.Nd5 e5 11.Qd1 e4 12.Nd4 > ² (0.34) Depth: 7/16 00:00:00 82kN >9.Nc3 Qxf5 10.Nd5 Bxd5 11.cxd5 Nf6 12.Bg5 Nxd5 13.0-0 > = (-0.08) Depth: 8/20 00:00:00 185kN >9.Nc3 Qxf5 10.Nd5 e5 11.Qd1 Qe4+ 12.Be3 Rc8 13.0-0 Qxc4 > = (0.00) Depth: 9/22 00:00:01 409kN >9.Nc3 Qxf5 10.Nd5 e5 11.Qd1 Qe4+ 12.Be3 Rc8 13.Qe2 Ne7 14.Nc3 > = (-0.15) Depth: 10/22 00:00:01 990kN >9.Nbd2 Bxf3 10.b4 Qxb4 11.Rb1 Qa5 12.Rb5 Qxa2 13.Nxf3 Qc2 > = (-0.06) Depth: 10/25 00:00:01 1551kN >9.Nbd2 Qxf5 10.0-0 e5 11.Re1 Be7 12.Qc3 Nf6 13.Nh4 Qf4 14.Ndf3 > = (-0.05) Depth: 11/25 00:00:03 2744kN >9.Nbd2 Qxf5 10.0-0 e5 11.Qe3 Ne7 12.Re1 Qc2 13.Ne4 Nf5 14.Qe2 Qxe2 15.Rxe2 > = (-0.02) Depth: 12/26 00:00:05 4839kN >9.Nbd2 Qxf5 10.0-0 e5 11.Qe3 Ne7 12.Re1 Qc2 13.Ng5 Nf5 14.Qh3 Be7 15.Nxh7 > = (0.02) Depth: 13/28 00:00:11 9467kN >9.Nbd2 Bxf3 10.b4 Qxb4 11.Rb1 Qa5 12.Rb5 Qxa2 13.Nxf3 b6 14.0-0 Rc8 15.Re1 Rxc4 > = (0.03) Depth: 14/33 00:00:32 27372kN >9.Nbd2 Qxf5 10.0-0 e5 11.Qe3 Ne7 12.Re1 Qc2 13.Qa3 Nf5 14.g4 Nh6 15.Nd4 Qg6 >16.h3 > = (0.21) Depth: 15/34 00:01:14 62544kN >9.Nbd2 Bxf3 10.b4 Qxb4 11.Rb1 Qa5 12.Rb5 Qxa2 13.Nxf3 b6 14.0-0 Rc8 15.Nd2 Nf6 >16.Re1 Kd8 > = (-0.08) Depth: 16/38 00:02:00 103194kN >9.Nbd2 Qxf5 10.0-0 e5 11.Qe3 Ne7 12.Re1 Qc2 13.Qa3 Nf5 14.c5 0-0-0 15.Qxa7 Qxc5 >16.Qxc5 dxc5 17.Nxe5 Bd5 > = (0.12) Depth: 17/47 00:05:39 293814kN >9.Nbd2 Bxf3 10.b4 Qxf5 11.Nxf3 Nf6 12.0-0 e5 13.Qd1 Be7 14.Bg5 0-0 15.Bxf6 Qxf6 >16.Qd5+ Qf7 17.Qxb7 Rab8 18.Qxa7 Rxb4 > = (0.12) Depth: 18/47 00:10:41 555874kN >9.Nbd2 Bxf3 10.b4 Qxf5 11.Nxf3 Nf6 12.0-0 e5 13.Qd1 Be7 14.Bg5 0-0 15.Bxf6 Qxf6 >16.Qd5+ Qf7 17.Qxb7 Rab8 18.Qxa7 Rxb4 19.Rac1 > = (0.16) Depth: 19/51 00:24:15 1261111kN >9.Nbd2 Qxf5 10.0-0 e5 11.Qe3 Qg6 12.b4 Nf6 13.Re1 Be7 14.b5 Bd7 15.Qa3 e4 16.Qe3 >0-0 17.Nxe4 d5 18.Nc5 Bh3 > = (0.02) Depth: 20/53 00:51:30 2695344kN > >(, 21.08.2005) Let me guess that the evaluation was slightly different than public fruit and the score for 9.Nc3 was 0.00 Let me guess that fruit could play 9.Nbd2 with different contempt score. Am I correct? Note that it seems that this mistake did not change the place of fruit in the tournament(second place). Note also that if there are people who put their money on gambling that fruit will not finish in the first 4 places based on your words before the tournament then you need to apologize. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.