Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:13:12 08/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2005 at 06:59:48, Joachim Rang wrote: >On August 24, 2005 at 06:35:40, Zheng Zhixian wrote: > >>On August 24, 2005 at 03:27:48, Joachim Rang wrote: >> >>>On August 24, 2005 at 01:11:36, William Sorin wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Will someone describe the chracteristics of Fruit as opposed to the playing >>>>style of other programs? Can it be described as human like? How I define >>>>humanlike is the ability to play speculatively. What are the main strengths of >>>>fruit? weaknesses? >>> >>>Fruit plays most certainly not humanlike but unspectacular. I agree that it >>>plays positionally fine but I think the strength of Fruit is that it plays very >>>balanced. It has no big weaknesses and plays not speculative like Junior or >>>Shredder. The playing style can be described as boring and coputerish but that >>>is the way to score your points. Fruit often refutes an unsound atack from great >>>attackers like Junior or Shredder (like in the WCCC). >> >>I see Peter Berger and Fabien and calling it a "skeptical program". ?? > >no speculative sacrifices, no unsound attacks, no over-optimistic evaluation of >some positions, just sound chess. ;-) > >regards Joachim In this case what happened in the game of fruit against diep. I did not analyze the game but I read during the game a claim that fruit's castling was a novelty that sacrifies a pawn. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.