Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 03:59:48 08/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2005 at 06:35:40, Zheng Zhixian wrote: >On August 24, 2005 at 03:27:48, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On August 24, 2005 at 01:11:36, William Sorin wrote: >> >>> >>>Will someone describe the chracteristics of Fruit as opposed to the playing >>>style of other programs? Can it be described as human like? How I define >>>humanlike is the ability to play speculatively. What are the main strengths of >>>fruit? weaknesses? >> >>Fruit plays most certainly not humanlike but unspectacular. I agree that it >>plays positionally fine but I think the strength of Fruit is that it plays very >>balanced. It has no big weaknesses and plays not speculative like Junior or >>Shredder. The playing style can be described as boring and coputerish but that >>is the way to score your points. Fruit often refutes an unsound atack from great >>attackers like Junior or Shredder (like in the WCCC). > >I see Peter Berger and Fabien and calling it a "skeptical program". ?? no speculative sacrifices, no unsound attacks, no over-optimistic evaluation of some positions, just sound chess. ;-) regards Joachim > > > > >>kind regards >> >>Joachim
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.