Author: Peter Berger
Date: 15:16:00 08/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2005 at 17:48:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 26, 2005 at 17:32:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 26, 2005 at 17:31:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 26, 2005 at 16:52:24, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>> >>>>On August 26, 2005 at 15:36:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 26, 2005 at 15:30:08, Peter Berger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I want to do some tests with strong chessengines, that can potentially be >>>>>>reproduced on both Windows and Linux systems. Engines should not be more than >>>>>>100 points weaker than Crafty. >>>>>> >>>>>>--- >>>>>> >>>>>>This is the short list of engines I came up with by myself: >>>>>> >>>>>>Deep Sjeng >>>>>>Ruffian >>>>>>Fruit >>>>>>Crafty >>>>>>Yace >>>>>>Comet >>>>>>Glaurung >>>>>> >>>>>>--- >>>>>> >>>>>>Anyone missing here who should or could be included? I hope I missed many. >>>>>> >>>>>>Peter >>>>> >>>>>I'd keep gnuchess in the batch as well... >>>> >>>> >>>>gnuchess?? Why would you choose gnuchess? There are tons of engines running >>>>under Linux that are stronger than gnuchess. >>>> >>>>Jin >>>>Arasan >>>>Pepito >>>>Beowulf >>>> >>>>etc.. >>>> >>>>Andy >>> >>> >>>he wanted many programs... it certainly plays decent chess... >> >>gnuchess is more than 100 points weaker than Crafty > > >depends on the hardware... I don't think there is any reasonable hardware ( instead of broken one I assume) where this doesn't hold :) - maybe Pocket PCs or Palms ?? With an even bigger silent tear I had to take out Phalanx - this used to be one of my *very* favourite engines for a long time - talking about decent chess it certainly qualifies .. - but it can't really compete anymore :( Unfortunately playing GNU just adds noise to data these days. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.