Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:48:34 08/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2005 at 17:32:28, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 26, 2005 at 17:31:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 26, 2005 at 16:52:24, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >> >>>On August 26, 2005 at 15:36:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On August 26, 2005 at 15:30:08, Peter Berger wrote: >>>> >>>>>I want to do some tests with strong chessengines, that can potentially be >>>>>reproduced on both Windows and Linux systems. Engines should not be more than >>>>>100 points weaker than Crafty. >>>>> >>>>>--- >>>>> >>>>>This is the short list of engines I came up with by myself: >>>>> >>>>>Deep Sjeng >>>>>Ruffian >>>>>Fruit >>>>>Crafty >>>>>Yace >>>>>Comet >>>>>Glaurung >>>>> >>>>>--- >>>>> >>>>>Anyone missing here who should or could be included? I hope I missed many. >>>>> >>>>>Peter >>>> >>>>I'd keep gnuchess in the batch as well... >>> >>> >>>gnuchess?? Why would you choose gnuchess? There are tons of engines running >>>under Linux that are stronger than gnuchess. >>> >>>Jin >>>Arasan >>>Pepito >>>Beowulf >>> >>>etc.. >>> >>>Andy >> >> >>he wanted many programs... it certainly plays decent chess... > >gnuchess is more than 100 points weaker than Crafty depends on the hardware...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.