Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:32:28 08/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2005 at 17:31:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 26, 2005 at 16:52:24, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On August 26, 2005 at 15:36:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 26, 2005 at 15:30:08, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>I want to do some tests with strong chessengines, that can potentially be >>>>reproduced on both Windows and Linux systems. Engines should not be more than >>>>100 points weaker than Crafty. >>>> >>>>--- >>>> >>>>This is the short list of engines I came up with by myself: >>>> >>>>Deep Sjeng >>>>Ruffian >>>>Fruit >>>>Crafty >>>>Yace >>>>Comet >>>>Glaurung >>>> >>>>--- >>>> >>>>Anyone missing here who should or could be included? I hope I missed many. >>>> >>>>Peter >>> >>>I'd keep gnuchess in the batch as well... >> >> >>gnuchess?? Why would you choose gnuchess? There are tons of engines running >>under Linux that are stronger than gnuchess. >> >>Jin >>Arasan >>Pepito >>Beowulf >> >>etc.. >> >>Andy > > >he wanted many programs... it certainly plays decent chess... gnuchess is more than 100 points weaker than Crafty
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.