Author: gerold daniels
Date: 20:25:10 08/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2005 at 23:07:45, A. Cozzie wrote: >Now that I am a graduate student, I have updated the Zappa webpage and moved it >to the university's site. So, while I appreciate Volker's hard work, I don't >have to steal his bandwidth anymore :) > >The new site: http://netfiles.uiuc.edu/acozzie2/www/zappa > >(it really amazes me that there is another acozzie in the world) > >Updates to the site: > >Zappa 1.1 (bugfix of 1.0, singular extensions actually work now, plus a few >trivial things). >Win64 and Linux versions. >(Yes, Zappa 2.0 will be commercial. It should be released sometime in >September. The engine is ready; the GUI is not. Although it does look Really >Nice). > >Games commented by GM Ehlvest (don't look for any serious analysis, just what he >was thinking when he played the moves). > >Zappa's games from the WCCC with score/depth/time for each move, and in a nice >format too :) > >Photo-journal for the WCCC and also the excursion we took. Note: I am not a fan >of thumbnails. Total its about a 3MB download for both Perhaps a bit large if >you are on dialup. > >Requests: > >I have been making two statements in the past few weeks that to be honest I have >no real proof of, only a gut feeling, namely a) that Zappa 1.0 (1.1) is a >reasonably strong engine, and b) that Zappa in general is much stronger at >longer TC than blitz. > >So I would be very interested in someone running a few matches, namely: > >Zappa 1.1 64bits - Fruit 2.1, 100 games, fritz8.ctg+swap-sides, tc. 5+1 >Zappa 1.1 64bits - Fruit 2.1, 100 games, fritz8.ctg+swap-sides, tc 15+5 >Zappa 1.1 64bits - Fruit 2.1, 100 games, fritz8.ctg+swap-sides, tc 40+10 >Zappa 1.1 64bits - Fruit 2.1, 100 games, fritz8.ctg+swap-sides, tc 90+30. > >I know that is a lot of CPU time (a few weeks total, I think), so only do it if >you are interested. I don't think 1.1 is quite a match for Fruit (even in >90+30), but I'm curious to see how it does. I know from talking to Fabien that >he would also be interested in a match like this, which is why I'm suggesting >Fruit. > >Anyway, if the score is the same for all timecontrols, then I will have to >recant my statements :) > >anthony Nice web site Anthony. Thanks. Gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.