Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 16:53:10 09/12/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2005 at 07:04:48, Thomas Logan wrote: >On September 10, 2005 at 03:04:30, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On September 09, 2005 at 18:37:39, Thomas Logan wrote: >> >>>These are new and interresting times but don't bury the old guard just yet >>> >>>Tom >> >>exactly. computerchess is more interesting then it was before. >> >>So many new things. >> >>Hiarcs10, fritz9, zappa, fruit ! > >Yes and Shredder 10 > >SMK may be motivated by Shredders sub par performance in WCCC classical to pull >out all the stops and give us a monster 3rd in the general division and 1st place in rapid is not sub par, in my opinion. With that small number of games, you cannot even remotely decide that Shredder is stronger or weaker. The error bar with this game volume is more than 400 Elo points.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.