Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 14:57:22 09/13/05
Go up one level in this thread
On September 12, 2005 at 19:53:10, Dann Corbit wrote: >On September 10, 2005 at 07:04:48, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On September 10, 2005 at 03:04:30, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On September 09, 2005 at 18:37:39, Thomas Logan wrote: >>> >>>>These are new and interresting times but don't bury the old guard just yet >>>> >>>>Tom >>> >>>exactly. computerchess is more interesting then it was before. >>> >>>So many new things. >>> >>>Hiarcs10, fritz9, zappa, fruit ! >> >>Yes and Shredder 10 >> >>SMK may be motivated by Shredders sub par performance in WCCC classical to pull >>out all the stops and give us a monster > >3rd in the general division and 1st place in rapid is not sub par, in my >opinion. > >With that small number of games, you cannot even remotely decide that Shredder >is stronger or weaker. The error bar with this game volume is more than 400 Elo >points. If one can not even say it was a sub par performance one has even less justification to bury Shredder which of cource is the point of my post Thanks Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.