Author: KarinsDad
Date: 11:30:44 03/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 03, 1999 at 12:40:05, Don Dailey wrote: [snip] > >I'm tired of speculating however. The truth of the matter is >that Deep Blue won. The only scientifically valid conclusion >you can draw from this is that it is slightly more likely that >Deep Blue is the better match player. Actually, this conclusion is just as speculative as a conclusion in the other direction. Scientifically speaking, the sample set for either conclusion is too small to be conclusive. Statistically, there isn't enough evidence to determine the better match player. KarinsDad > Anything more than this >is a very fallible judgement call and speculation. > [snip]
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.