Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 04:13:04 10/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2005 at 06:41:35, billiau wrote: >Due to the results i saw in the CEGT list against Spike10a Mainz. >I had some doubts about my own testing in blitz so i ran another test this >night. >See below what is the result (70% for FruitHist50 same as Fruit Uri) : >I known it's only blitz games but i just would like to verify i did not dream. > >Arena tournament >Rank Engine Score Fr Sp S-B >1 FruitHist50 28,0/40 · ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· · >11==01010111011=010101==11011111=11==111 336,00 >2 Spike10a 12,0/40 00==10101000100=101010==00100000=00==000 · ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· >·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· · 336,00 > >40 games played / Tournament finished >Tournament start: 2005.10.18, 05:56:57 >Latest update: 2005.10.18, 12:12:26 >Site/ Country: ANTEC, France >Level: Blitz 4/2 >Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+ 2104 MHz with 511 MB Memory >Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 2 (Build 2600) >PGN-File: C:\Program Files\Arena\Arena.pgn >Table created with: Arena 1.1 Hi, there is of course no doubt that the Fruit setting is stronger. It is sometimes only a question of having enough games. In the second match here Fruit 2.2 Uri is leading by 9,5:0,5 against Spike. Surely this result is too good, as the other one before was too bad. Combining many gives the right picture for each match. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.