Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 ?! Statistics for 2.Qh5

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 15:25:26 11/12/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 12, 2005 at 13:23:01, Drexel,Michael wrote:

>On November 12, 2005 at 11:09:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On November 12, 2005 at 10:27:48, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>>
>>>I have 71 games in my computerchess database (1.635.000 games) White won 21
>>>black won 34 and and 16 draws.
>>>
>>>Bertil
>>
>>      A score of only 40,8 % with the white
>>      pieces is indeed very bad and much below
>>      the usual standards. Your statistic tends
>>      to prove that 2.Qh5 is a bad continuation.
>>      Regards
>>      Kurt
>
>Such statisics can not prove anything.
>If you search the computer database from Eigenmann for example you get a bunch
>of games from an engine "BremboCE" which lost a bunch of games with this opening
>against much stronger engines.
>
>Never trust a statistic you haven´t forged yourself.
>
>Michael

Hi!

Ïf you only count games between "stronger programs like Shredder, Fritz and
Hiarcs the result was 8-10 and of course it proves nothing.

Bertil



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.