Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 ?! Statistics for 2.Qh5

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 10:23:01 11/12/05

Go up one level in this thread

On November 12, 2005 at 11:09:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On November 12, 2005 at 10:27:48, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>I have 71 games in my computerchess database (1.635.000 games) White won 21
>>black won 34 and and 16 draws.
>>
>>Bertil
>
>      A score of only 40,8 % with the white
>      pieces is indeed very bad and much below
>      the usual standards. Your statistic tends
>      to prove that 2.Qh5 is a bad continuation.
>      Regards
>      Kurt

Such statisics can not prove anything.
If you search the computer database from Eigenmann for example you get a bunch
of games from an engine "BremboCE" which lost a bunch of games with this opening
against much stronger engines.

Never trust a statistic you haven´t forged yourself.

Michael

• Re: 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 ?! Statistics for 2.Qh5 Bertil Eklund 15:25:26 11/12/05
• Re: 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 ?! Statistics for 2.Qh5 Dieter Buerssner 10:30:26 11/12/05
  • Re: 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 ?! Statistics for 2.Qh5 Dieter Buerssner 10:51:03 11/12/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.