Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 ?! Statistics for 2.Qh5

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 10:30:26 11/12/05

Go up one level in this thread

On November 12, 2005 at 13:23:01, Drexel,Michael wrote:

>Such statisics can not prove anything.

I agree. Actually, I just was about to write a similar post than yours.

>Never trust a statistic you haven´t forged yourself.

Something interesting to read about this cite (which seems to be well known in
Germany):

http://www.zeit.de/archiv/2002/18/200218_stimmts_churchil.xml

Regards,
Dieter

• Re: 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 ?! Statistics for 2.Qh5 Dieter Buerssner 10:51:03 11/12/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.