Author: Aaron Gordon
Date: 01:15:01 11/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2005 at 03:49:29, A. Steen wrote: >On November 21, 2005 at 03:31:16, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On November 21, 2005 at 03:28:11, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>I further enlighten you the main point, and I am a troll? You must be smoking >>>the "good" stuff, eh? >> >>Just so you don't have something ELSE to troll about, I mean "enlighten you to >>the main point". > >So, accusing me of committing an act which is a criminal offence in most parts >of the world, including the jurisdiction(s) in which you and I find ourselves at >the present moment, and an act of which I have always been innocent, gave you >pause to consider whether you were being reaonable and prudent? If you were born that way, I truely am sorry. >Please do not be concerned about any consequences. I have a thick skin, and >ignore the loser's ad hominems as a matter of course. Some might even wear them >as a badge of honour. But please keep the discussion to computer chess. :) > >You asked me for an example where EGTBs are less than useful - Uri may have >helped you here with such a one- >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?463314 > >Best, > >A.S. I tried Kxb3 and it is a sure loss, EGTBs showing instant mate in 73. Without EGTBs Fruit plays this move, with EGTBs it avoids it.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.