Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What is the Chess Judgement Worth of +/-500 Elopoints?

Author: Sune Larsson

Date: 16:27:29 11/25/05

Go up one level in this thread


On November 25, 2005 at 19:21:08, Uri Blass wrote:

>On November 25, 2005 at 19:02:03, Sune Larsson wrote:
>
>>On November 25, 2005 at 18:50:00, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On November 25, 2005 at 18:29:36, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>>
>>>>Excuse me - would you accept the authority in chess questions of a superior
>>>>player if he had 600 Elo points more than most here in CCC? I know that Vincent
>>>>is 2350 or such, let's exclude him, how many then have more than 2200?
>>>>
>>>>I do not say that you must crawl on the floor in presence of such a good player,
>>>>I do not say that his on a fly judgement is _always_ better than what _you_ say
>>>>for example but cant you accept that _normally_ a real master plays chess in a
>>>>different ligue? And a last question: you had NOT the impression that this A.S.
>>>>knew what he was talking about? I mean just his chess related comments? That the
>>>>move of FRUIT (g5) would clearly lose and that therefore it made sense to play
>>>>the "second-best" mentioned move? And so forth? Was this all mediocre chess
>>>>comment?
>>>
>>>You do not need to be a strong player to understand that g5 is bad.
>>>
>>>It is enough to analyze the positions with chess programs to find it.
>>>After the lines that he gave fruit had no problem to see a clear negative score
>>>in few minutes so I guess that it has no problem to see that g5 is bad from the
>>>root position if you only give it enough time.
>>>
>>>I will probably not respond to some posts in this thread but I do not think that
>>>the poster need to have special right because some claim that he is a strong
>>>player.
>>>
>>>I do not claim that he is a weak player[note that the programmer of chess system
>>>tal (chris W) is not a weak player and is probably better player than most of
>>>the posters] but I doubt if he is a master.
>>>
>>>Note that people suspect that the poster is Chris W mainly because Chris has a
>>>history of posting not under his real name.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>
>> And just Why do you suspect so much instead of just looking at the chessy
>> substance of the posts??
>>
>> Puzzeled regards
>> /S
>
>Saeah mentioned first Chris W and not me.
>
>Uri

 Yes - and then I can mention "John"...but the chess is really what matters -
or...?

/S



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.