Author: Zheng Zhixian
Date: 14:12:38 12/06/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 06, 2005 at 09:03:24, Fernando Villegas wrote: >It seems we have here a severe case of miss understanding from both of us. This >is not the first time you jump into one of my posts to say something critical, >some times with a harsh tone, always in disagree with me, many times bothered >for what I have said. There is no misunderstanding. I have observed your antics here for a long while already. How could I not? Next to Rolf and Chandler you revel in your importance. You may be a celebrity of sorts in your home country, and a old timer here, so I don't know if that causes you to think you have the right to make jokes and pour scorn on people (in a warm or jokingly way only of course) you disagree with. >Somewhere there is a short circuit between us. >No, I do not excuse with jokes. I do not excuse with or without jokes no >existing reasons to do so. I try to explain when asked or critiziced as you do >so often. When posting on the net, you will notice that there are some people who almost always reply when someone addresses them. No matter what, such persons tends to or wants to have the last word. The only exception maybe is if the person replying expresses 100% agreement. And if the first person gets into an arguement with the second person are both of the same type, we have a long almost unending thread. You are one of such people I think. And I am usually one of those people. But I've long realised the futility of such discussions, in the end it's just shows the ego of the person wanting the last word. And I usually let you have it. That doesn't mean i agree or you win the argument. >Nevertheless, I must confess I tend to lose my patience when I perceive that the bad will persist, no matter what. >Also I tend to lose my patience with so many people here -not you, of course- >with such a sanctimonious vision of everything, beginning with this trivial >hobby of chess computers. And *I* tend to lose my patience with the few know it alls, who under the guise of jokes think they are the ones blessed with the vision (and are not myopic) and the right to lecture the whole forum because they think people have 'a sanctimonious vision of everything, beginning with this trival hobby of chess computers'. And yes, behind all the claims of joking and laughing at yourself, in the above paragraph, I think you finially confess at least partly the real intent of most of your 'jokes'. >I wonder why this people is so myopic. Indeed, compared to the all seeing and wise Fernando? Don't borther telling me you make fun of yourself as well, that's merely a cover you use so you can claim you play the role as a joker. I disagree with many things that are said here by many posters, in some ways I even agree with some of what you say, but I don't call these people 'myopic' or think they have a 'sanctimonious view' or their interests trival just because they don't interest me. If anything I find your own attitude as sanctimonious as anything as anything said here with all your lecturing. If that makes me sanctimonious too, so be it. At least I admit it. Just because the majority view disagrees with you on say the importance of chess stength, you feel free to lecture everyone and make jokes as if everyone was stupid and crazy but you. There are other valid view points then just yours Fernando, and i'm surprised for someone who (please correct me if I'm wrong) happily admits to be a old fart, hasn't yet grasped this concept. PS You are not the only one who can play shrink or psychological games.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.