Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 02:44:09 12/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2005 at 01:05:57, Albert Silver wrote: >I can't recall Deep Fritz 8 ever looking in such bad shape. It lost even winning >attacks. Here is one position where I was certain Rybka was done for: Deep Fritz 8 lost from this position????? WOW! > >5k1r/pb3q2/1p2p1Rp/3nPp1Q/2r2P2/P5P1/1P2N3/4KB1R w K - 0 32 > >I think Rybka is a poor name. Houdini seems more appropriate. :-):-) He,he,he....... Thanks for the extremely interesting tests! If you continue and against Tiger or Hiarcs "slightly positional" continues to perform much better than default, then i'll do the same with longer time controls to se if this is something general. As slightly positional must cut some knowledge and make it more "bean counter" from very positional, i think a part of the better results, as your games are blitz, comes from this...... >
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.