Author: Albert Silver
Date: 06:48:21 12/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 08, 2005 at 05:44:09, George Tsavdaris wrote:
>On December 08, 2005 at 01:05:57, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>I can't recall Deep Fritz 8 ever looking in such bad shape. It lost even winning
>>attacks. Here is one position where I was certain Rybka was done for:
>
>Deep Fritz 8 lost from this position????? WOW!
>
>>
>>5k1r/pb3q2/1p2p1Rp/3nPp1Q/2r2P2/P5P1/1P2N3/4KB1R w K - 0 32
>>
>>I think Rybka is a poor name. Houdini seems more appropriate.
>
>:-):-) He,he,he.......
>
> Thanks for the extremely interesting tests! If you continue and against Tiger
>or Hiarcs "slightly positional" continues to perform much better than default,
Going to be hard IMHO. 19 games so far and Rybka "very positional" leads Tiger
15-4 already.
Albert
>then i'll do the same with longer time controls to se if this is something
>general. As slightly positional must cut some knowledge and make it more "bean
>counter" from very positional, i think a part of the better results, as your
>games are blitz, comes from this......
>
>>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.