Author: Roger Brown
Date: 18:10:11 12/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
> >I think that the author is one person and the people who are interested in rybka >are many people. >from moral point of view the wish of the public is more important in case that >there is no law that say what to do. hello Uri, Think really hard about this one. The edge of this cliff is the beginning of a horrible fall. A minority is protected from the actions of a majority by the action of the law. If you do not get it then it seems clear to me that minorities everywhere should be running for the hills. A majority view does not make something legal or even right. I will respectfully end it here as our perspectives are so different that we may well be speaking of apples and wheelbarrows. >I think that what is legal and illegal should be clear to most people. >You can see from the discussions here that a lot assumed that it is legal to >share rybka with other people. Really? Are you really serious with this point? :-) Later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.