Author: emerson tan
Date: 08:07:13 12/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 15, 2005 at 11:02:45, emerson tan wrote: >On December 15, 2005 at 10:57:10, emerson tan wrote: > >>On December 15, 2005 at 07:55:46, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>On December 15, 2005 at 04:02:38, emerson tan wrote: >>> >>>>I posted the position of Nikolic vs Fischer 5 years ago in this forum and no >>>>program can find Fischer's 19...Bg4!! even if you let all the programs compute >>>>for several days. >>>> >>>>The position is sound because I let the computer play the position and black >>>>always win even if both white and black engine asses the position as winning for >>>>white. >>>> >>>>Now 5 years after with several times faster hardware and emergence of strong >>>>programs and improved old programs, Can any program find Fischer's 19...Bg4 !! >>>> >>>> Nikolic,E - Fischer,R, Vinkovci 1968 >>>>[D] r3r1k1/pp1q1p2/2p2npb/PPPp1bnp/3PpN2/2N1P1PP/1R1B1PBK/3Q1R2 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Are you sure this sac is winning ? >>> >>>23.Kg1 seems strange >>> >>>[d]r3r1k1/pp1q1p2/2p2npb/PPPp4/3PpN2/2N1PpP1/1R1B1P1K/3Q3R w - - 0 23 >>> >>>TogaIIa after 2 sec and Rybka after 29 sec give up with 23.Kg1 >>> >>>Analysis by Toga II 1.1a: >>>... >>>23.Rg1 Rg7 24.a6 Fxf4 25.exf4 Th8 26.Txh8 Txh8 27.f5 gxf5 28.bxc6 bxc6 >>> +- (1.47) Profondeur: 9/25 00:00:00 488kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Df1 Th8 25.Rg1 Tab8 26.a6 bxa6 27.bxc6 Dxc6 28.Txb8 Txb8 >>> +- (1.53) Profondeur: 9/25 00:00:02 1392kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Tab8 25.Db1 Dc7 26.b6 axb6 27.axb6 Dd7 28.Ta2 >>> +- (1.58) Profondeur: 10/28 00:00:04 2524kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Tab8 25.Da4 Dc7 26.b6 axb6 27.axb6 De7 28.Da7 Th8 >>> +- (1.64) Profondeur: 11/28 00:00:07 4407kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 a6 25.bxc6 bxc6 26.Db1 Th8 27.Tb7 Dg4 28.Db6 De6 29.Dc7 >>> +- (1.76) Profondeur: 12/32 00:00:18 10816kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Th8 25.a6 Fxe3 26.bxc6 Dg4 27.Fxe3 Txh3 28.Txh3 Dxh3 29.Df1 >>>Dxf1+ 30.Rxf1 bxc6 31.Tb7 >>> +- (1.73) Profondeur: 13/37 00:00:33 19690kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Th8 25.bxc6 bxc6 26.Db1 Df5 27.Tb7 Fxe3 28.Fxe3 Txh3 29.Txh3 >>>Dxh3 30.Df1 Dxf1+ 31.Rxf1 Th8 32.Re1 a6 >>> +- (1.58) Profondeur: 14/37 00:00:47 28258kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Th8 25.bxc6 bxc6 26.Db1 Dc8 27.Tb7 Fxe3 28.Fxe3 Txh3 29.Txh3 >>>Dxh3 30.Df1 Dxf1+ 31.Rxf1 Cg4 32.Ff4 Th8 33.Rg1 >>> +- (1.48) Profondeur: 15/39 00:01:14 45092kN >>> >>> >>>Analysis by Rybka 1.0 Beta 32-bit: >>>... >>>23.Rg1 Rg7 24.Ch3 Tab8 25.a6 cxb5 26.Txb5 >>> ± (1.32) Profondeur: 10 00:00:05 362kN >>>23.Rg1 Rg7 24.Ch3 Teb8 25.Db3 Dc8 26.Cf4 Cg4 >>> ± (1.34) Profondeur: 11 00:00:10 624kN >>>23.Rg1 Fxf4 24.exf4 Rg7 25.bxc6 bxc6 26.Df1 Th8 27.Txh8 Txh8 >>> ² (0.55) Profondeur: 12 00:00:24 1616kN >>>23.bxc6 bxc6 24.Ch3 Cg4+ 25.Rg1 Rg7 26.Db1 Th8 27.Tb7 Dc8 >>> ± (1.05) Profondeur: 12 00:00:29 1993kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Teb8 25.Da4 Cg4 26.a6 De6 27.Tb1 >>> ± (1.39) Profondeur: 12 00:01:03 4318kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Tab8 25.Db3 Dc7 26.b6 axb6 27.cxb6 Dd7 >>> +- (1.49) Profondeur: 13 00:01:48 7503kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 Tab8 25.Db3 Th8 26.bxc6 Dxc6 27.Tb1 Dd7 >>> +- (1.49) Profondeur: 14 00:02:29 10406kN >>>23.Ch3 Rg7 24.Rg1 a6 25.bxc6 bxc6 26.Df1 Th8 27.Ca4 Dg4 >>> +- (1.47) Profondeur: 15 00:04:02 16959kN >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>[Event "Vinkovci"] >>>[Site "Vinkovci"] >>>[Date "1968.??.??"] >>>[Round "9"] >>>[White "Nikolic, Emil"] >>>[Black "Fischer, Robert James"] >>>[Result "0-1"] >>>[ECO "E61"] >>>[PlyCount "62"] >>>[EventDate "1968.09.??"] >>>[EventRounds "13"] >>>[EventCountry "YUG"] >>> >>>1. c4 g6 2. Nc3 Bg7 3. g3 e5 4. Bg2 d6 5. e3 Nf6 6. Nge2 O-O 7. O-O c6 8. d4 >>>Re8 9. Rb1 e4 10. b4 Bf5 11. h3 h5 12. Nf4 Nbd7 13. a4 Nf8 14. c5 d5 15. b5 >>>N8h7 16. Bd2 Ng5 17. Rb2 Qd7 18. Kh2 Bh6 19. a5 Bg4 20. hxg4 hxg4 21. Rh1 Nf3+ >>>22. Bxf3 gxf3 23. Kg1 Bxf4 24. exf4 Kg7 25. f5 Rh8 26. Bh6+ Rxh6 27. Rxh6 Kxh6 >>>28. Qd2+ g5 29. bxc6 Qxf5 30. Nd1 Qh3 31. Ne3 Kg6 0-1 >> >> >>I run eng eng match with the position after 19...Bg4 with Shredder taking as >>white and fritz as Black. I also tried Hiarcs as white against Fritz. white >>always end up losing even though initially for several moves, shredder, hiarcs >>and fritz evaluate white as winning. So maybe the evaluation you see on other >>engines cant see the win for black also. >> >>I chose shredder and hiarcs as white coz they have position learning, they will >>not play the same line twice after they lose, so in a series of games, you can >>see many variations trying different lines. I run about 30 plus games with >>shredder and Fritz and 30 plus games with hiarcs and fritz at 40/2 20/1 and >>white always end up losing. The engine starts playing at move 20 so there's a >>lot of time to think for the engine. With the results, I think its a winning >>position for black after 19...Bg4 >> >>Its nice to explore that position, trying to find the truth in it. > > >addendum: I remember also eventually hiarcs and shredder also chose the line 23. >Nh3 but they also lost as white. I forgot to save those files, anyway if you >have time and it interrest you, you can try it yourself I wonder how Hydra or Deep Blue assses it
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.