Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Computer cheating, another perspective?

Author: Micheal Cummings

Date: 23:05:09 03/27/99

Go up one level in this thread



On March 27, 1999 at 21:56:24, Marc Plum wrote:

>We've seen quite a lot in this forum about computer cheating.  One recent thread
>started with someone submitting a game from a suspected cheater, and asking if
>others agreed with him.  There have been many discussions and arguments of this
>kind on RGCC as well.  Many of these threads seem to start with the point of
>view that a particular person, named or unnamed, is guilty of cheating, and give
>arguments in favor of this view.
>
>I would find it interesting to hear another side of this.  I believe we have a
>number of readers who are considered expert in tracking cheaters.  Do they have
>any stories of accusations that turned out to be definitely unjustified?  For
>those who may investigate such accusations for ICC, FICS, etc, how often do
>inexpert players make unjustified accusations?
>
>Best Wishes,
>
>Marc


Well I think this Allerwan or whatever his name is that won against a GM is
still only suspected of cheating, none of this has still been proven 100%. And
still no punishment has been handed to this person



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.