Author: Ryan B.
Date: 03:28:28 12/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 06:21:54, Paul Jacobean Sacral wrote: >On December 23, 2005 at 06:13:13, Uri Blass wrote: > >>one idea in Toga is used in fruit but Fabien could probably use it even without >>Toga. > >Of course you are right, but wasn't it urgently required to present a different >view in contrast to the ugly "black-white" views where Gaksch was the evil and >Letouzey was the saint? > >What do you think about closed source and about going commercial after improving >a software project being open source for a limited time? Imagine you'd had >contributed to such an open source project. What do you think? Is it perfectly >ok, is it 100% honest beyond all doubt? Is the one who uses open source >complaint to the licence, the only evil guy, and is the one who benefits from >the open source period and has now gone commercial, the perfectly good guy with >the clean record? > >Be realistic please. If you are capable and not someone who lives in a phantasy >world... > >Yours truly Paul J. Sacral Fabian gained nothing code wise being open source. The only change Toga made that Fabian also did was extending recaps in PV. This was natural and would have been done with or without Toga. I am not trying to make Toga evil, just saying it did not help Fabian. Fruit being open source did however help many other programmers. Ryan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.