Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 11:48:11 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 14:25:20, Sune Larsson wrote: >On December 27, 2005 at 14:06:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On December 27, 2005 at 12:40:16, Richard Sutherland wrote: >> >>>On December 27, 2005 at 12:19:30, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Let´s give some variations where Rybka play weak. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>You need look no further than 11 .... g5 for an example of this. What on >>>earth was going through the silicon monsters head when it uncorked this beauty >>>(and yes, I know I'm a patzer). >>> >>> >>>I think that one of the problems that we have in this newshroup, that gives rise >>>to unrealistic expectations of programs abilities, is the way programs are >>>tested. Using one machine with two engines running on it in match after match at >>>short time controls, will not prove which program is better at chess. >> >> >>I agree 100% with you and I already had the same debate with Albert S. I doubt >>that it's easy to teach the average testers why it is not so informative to test >>like they do their testing. And what I doubt most is that Rybka's author plans >>to create a computer-best program. IMO he wants to present a good chess tool for >>the best, good and average chessplayers. And this is something totally different >>than producing "another" engine-engine-best entity. SInce Vas never told us >>different, > > > > >my critic was practical irony with a bit of spice "dedicated" to the >>"followers of fashion..." [after the famous song from the KINKS, a favorite band >>of mine when I was young] > > > If you use irony on the internet - then you are almost begging about > becoming misunderstood...This is one of the basics when exchanging thoughts > on the internet. > > /S But you must admit that this way you avoid caring or cultivating for a huge claque. A real knowie would never miss the real meaning. Just like no real expert _ever_ took me wrong on my "weak" English - because he had done the neccessary interpretations by himself... of course others expect the explanations from the writer which is a common misunderstanding. No hen ever heated the water to cook her eggs for human beings. ;)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.