Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 12:00:05 12/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 2005 at 14:48:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On December 27, 2005 at 14:25:20, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>On December 27, 2005 at 14:06:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On December 27, 2005 at 12:40:16, Richard Sutherland wrote: >>> >>>>On December 27, 2005 at 12:19:30, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Let´s give some variations where Rybka play weak. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>You need look no further than 11 .... g5 for an example of this. What on >>>>earth was going through the silicon monsters head when it uncorked this beauty >>>>(and yes, I know I'm a patzer). >>>> >>>> >>>>I think that one of the problems that we have in this newshroup, that gives rise >>>>to unrealistic expectations of programs abilities, is the way programs are >>>>tested. Using one machine with two engines running on it in match after match at >>>>short time controls, will not prove which program is better at chess. >>> >>> >>>I agree 100% with you and I already had the same debate with Albert S. I doubt >>>that it's easy to teach the average testers why it is not so informative to test >>>like they do their testing. And what I doubt most is that Rybka's author plans >>>to create a computer-best program. IMO he wants to present a good chess tool for >>>the best, good and average chessplayers. And this is something totally different >>>than producing "another" engine-engine-best entity. SInce Vas never told us >>>different, >> >> >> >> >>my critic was practical irony with a bit of spice "dedicated" to the >>>"followers of fashion..." [after the famous song from the KINKS, a favorite band >>>of mine when I was young] >> >> >> If you use irony on the internet - then you are almost begging about >> becoming misunderstood...This is one of the basics when exchanging thoughts >> on the internet. >> >> /S > >But you must admit that this way you avoid caring or cultivating for a huge >claque. A real knowie would never miss the real meaning. Just like no real >expert _ever_ took me wrong on my "weak" English - because he had done the >neccessary interpretations by himself... of course others expect the >explanations from the writer which is a common misunderstanding. > >No hen ever heated the water to cook her eggs for human beings. ;) No, I'm generally not a friend of irony. I think it exists much better qualities to develop as a human being. /S
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.