Author: Stuart Cracraft
Date: 10:52:49 12/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 29, 2005 at 05:58:50, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 29, 2005 at 05:56:33, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On December 29, 2005 at 05:02:36, Tord Romstad wrote: >> >>>On December 29, 2005 at 04:49:09, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>> >>>>On December 28, 2005 at 16:04:28, Tord Romstad wrote: >>>> >>>>>Perhaps you can even omit some >>>>>piece types. I don't evaluate pawn or king mobility at all (in my >>>>>experience, there are better ways to evaluate king activity), and I >>>>>have never seen any measurable difference in strength when I >>>>>switch queen mobility on or off. >>>> >>>>What about knights? >>> >>>Good question. I have never tried disabling knight mobility, but >>>it is perfectly possible that a piece square table with high values >>>for central squares would work just as well as pseudo-legal >>>mobility for knights. >>> >>>Tord >> >>My mobility for the knight is legal mobility. >>Knight that is pinned get no bonus. >> >>Uri > >When I think more about it I will need to give it negative score when I change >my mobility evaluation because today I give every side bonus based on the number >of all moves and I plan to change it to bonus based on the number of all moves >relative to material(similiar to fruit) > >Uri By "all moves relative to material" what do you mean? Stuart
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.