Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:57:56 01/04/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 04, 2006 at 07:06:23, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >Thoralf, > >our List is for me in future no longer acceptable! > >Fritz 9 played 11x against Opponents with 450 MHz and 1x against 200 MHz (3-1 >against Fritz 5.32). > >Fruit 2.2.1 but played much more against opponents with 1,2 GHz and only 3x >against 450 MHz. > >That are not egual conditions and hard for Fritz 9, then he must win about 90% >need he hold the first place. > >But 90% is not possible. No program can win 90% on 1,2 GHz against good >opponents with 450 MHz. > >I seems You know this. Fruit2.2.1 beated Nimzo8 on 450 mhz 36-4 so it is simply not correct. Fruit2.2.1 also performed better against the same opponents. comparison against the same opponents 1 Fruit 2.2.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz, 2852 Fritz 9 A1200 5-7 Shredd9 A1200 20-20 Junior9 A1200 24.5-16.5 Hiarcs9 A1200 27.5-16.5 Nimzo 8 K6450 36-4 2 Fritz 9.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz, 2819 Fruit22 A1200 7-5 Shredd9 A1200 21.5-21.5 Junior9 A1200 23-17 Hiarcs9 A1200 29.5-14.5 Nimzo 8 K6450 32-8 Fruit performed better against Junior9 and against Nimzo8 Fritz performed better against Hiarcs9 and in direct match. Let ignore games against shredder when both scored 50% We are going to include results against Junior9 later in the comparison. Fruit result not including games Junior9 is 5-7 against Fritz9+27.5-16.5 against Hiarcs9+36-4 against Nimzo 8= 68.5-27.5 Fritz result are 7-5(Fruit2.2.1)+29.5-14.5(Hiarcs9)+32-8(nimzo8)=68.5-27.5 equal result so we can decide that fruit performed better against same opponents based on the games against Junior9(A1200) when Fruit won 24.5-16.5 and Fritz won only 23-17. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.