Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No offense, but I think it invalidates the results.

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 17:30:53 01/18/06

Go up one level in this thread


On January 18, 2006 at 20:02:28, Albert Silver wrote:

>On January 18, 2006 at 19:18:42, robert flesher wrote:
>
>>Thank-you for the observation, however, unless its a book loss which it is not I
>>think it is fair game. Although I understand that perhaps this can stastically
>>alter the final results, maybe not. I guess book learning would fix this issue,
>>it does give me some thinking to do, cheers.
>
>With all due respect, I think it simply invalidates the results. 1 game in 6 had
>the exact same opening? How can one possibly compare the strength of the engines
>in such a case?

What do you call strength? How strong would an engine be if it must have all
these features integrated? Still as strong as Rybka? No offense meant of course.


>
>                                        Albert



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.