Author: Albert Silver
Date: 18:18:01 01/18/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 18, 2006 at 20:30:53, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>On January 18, 2006 at 20:02:28, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>On January 18, 2006 at 19:18:42, robert flesher wrote:
>>
>>>Thank-you for the observation, however, unless its a book loss which it is not I
>>>think it is fair game. Although I understand that perhaps this can stastically
>>>alter the final results, maybe not. I guess book learning would fix this issue,
>>>it does give me some thinking to do, cheers.
>>
>>With all due respect, I think it simply invalidates the results. 1 game in 6 had
>>the exact same opening? How can one possibly compare the strength of the engines
>>in such a case?
>
>What do you call strength? How strong would an engine be if it must have all
>these features integrated? Still as strong as Rybka? No offense meant of course.
The features are in the GUI and not the engines, and they are there and don't
need to be integrated.
Albert
>
>
>>
>> Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.