Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 06:49:21 01/19/06
Go up one level in this thread
On January 19, 2006 at 09:41:39, Albert Silver wrote: >On January 19, 2006 at 09:01:07, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On January 19, 2006 at 08:45:23, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>>I think that if a program doesn't know not to repeat a losing line >>>>then it deserves it's fate. >>> >>>There's only one problem: it isn't the engine's fault. >>> >> >>You mean it's not the fault of the engine if it makes a decisive fault in a >>chess game? I think this is a simple wordplay but it has no real value as a >>verdict. > >The choice of openings is not made by the engine, but by the book used and the >parameters chosen in the program (such as the Fritz interface, Arena, etc.). The >engine makes no opening choice of any kind. So this huge repetition of openings >is not Rybka's choice/fault but the fault of the openings settings used. Rybka >just played the openings it was told to. It had no choice in the matter when it >was told to play the same opening 31 times. > > Albert All agreed but why did it play the losing line if it's otherware is so strong? We always touch the same point as last year, as every year in CC. I always said that the pretended strength is a myth. These engines are not strong like our super GM.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.