Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: First results CHESS 2010 POLL

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 22:02:59 04/05/99


First results CHESS 2010 POLL

Here are the first 144 entries I received the last days. Its results sofar are
quite interesting how people use a chess program and their general thoughts
how chess companies should improve their software for the future.

I would like to encourage everybody who has an opinion about the below
mentioned subjects to contribute to the poll as the more opinions the more
reliable the results.

The direct URL to the poll:

http://www.rebel.nl/poll2010.htm

Kind regards,

Ed Schroder



                  Results CHESS 2010 POLL


Question 1: What is more important for you using a chess program, its
performance against humans or its performance against other computers
when the topic is playing strength?

Its performance against humans is more important              109
Its performance against other computers is more important      22
ABSTAIN                                                        13


Question 2: Given the fact that because of the ever increasing
hardware speed-up these days chess programs are already tactical
monsters, then what is more important for you using a chess program,
its positional understanding or its tactical capabilities?

I prefer positional understanding above more tactical power   119
I prefer more tactical power above positional understanding    14
ABSTAIN                                                        11


Question 3: We have tried to explain that being the strongest chess
program against other chess programs doesn't necessarily mean that
the program in question is also the strongest chess program against
humans. Do you agree with this proposition?

I agree with the proposition                                  118
I do not agree with the proposition                            19
ABSTAIN                                                         7


Question 4: How do you use a chess program most?
For playing games, analysis and study                         109
For playing computer vs computer and/or solving positions      30
ABSTAIN                                                         4


Question 5: Which is in your opinion the strongest chess program
at the moment in the HUMAN versus COMP area?

REBEL10                          50
Hiarcs7                          27
Fritz 5.32                       20
ChessMaster 6000                  9
Mchess8                           4
Crafty 16.6                       1
Junior5                           1
Genius6                           0
Chess Tiger                       0
Shredder3                         0
Nimzo99                           0
ABSTAIN                          32


Question 6: Which is in your opinion the strongest chess program
at the moment in the COMPUTER versus COMPUTER area?

Fritz 5.32                       47
Hiarcs7                          31
ChessMaster 6000                 18
REBEL10                          11
Chess Tiger                       3
Mchess8                           1
Genius6                           1
Junior5                           1
Crafty 16.6                       0
Shredder3                         0

Nimzo99                           0
ABSTAIN                          30


Question 7: Should chess programs be allowed to play in normal
chess tournaments and get a FIDE rating?

YES, allow chess programs in FIDE                             108
NO, do not allow chess programs in FIDE                        30
ABSTAIN                                                         6


Question 8: If chess programs would have a FIDE rating would the
order of chess programs in comparison with computer-computer lists
(such as the SSDF) be different and to what extend?

SSDF vs FIDE would differ +/- 100 elo (or more)                45
SSDF vs FIDE would differ not much (+/- 50 elo)                52
SSDF vs FIDE would be in balance (+/- 20 elo)                  15
ABSTAIN                                                        32


Question 9: We have tried to explain that adding new chess knowledge
which makes a chess program a better positional player could lower
the playing strength in the comp-comp area and that removing chess
knowledge which makes a chess program a lower positional player on
the other hand could improve its performance in the comp-comp area,
then how would you like chess companies to handle this phenomenon in
the future?

Do not compromize to the program's positional understanding    99
Do not compromize to the program's comp-comp performance       22
ABSTAIN                                                        22

Number of polls 144




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.