Author: h.g.muller
Date: 07:44:16 02/11/06
Go up one level in this thread
You are right: I did not think of implementing promotions. (That could be fixed in a few minutes, of course, but for some reason I took the directive to not worry about e.p., castling and double move also to not worry about promotion. Without real justification, of course, it does not specify that explicitly...) Like you say, the problems do not really seem well defined, which makes automated testing kind of a lottery. Would it tell you which test it failed, and give you a second chance? It seems a bit hard to irrevocably reject solutions just because the contestant picked the wrong direction of play for the upper-case pieces...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.