Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 21:57:24 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2006 at 00:26:12, Peter Kappler wrote: >On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >>commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >>thread. >> >>As per the charter: >> >>Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >>post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >>messages: >> >> 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess >> 2. Are not abusive in nature >> 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others >> 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations >> 5. Are not of questionable legal status. >> >>What about rule #4 do you not understand? >> >>Peter > > >So, this insulting post is your best attempt to handle the situation? Are you >kidding me? You could have emailed Vasik directly, but I guess that would have >robbed you of too much glory, huh? > >And please spare me the disingenuous crap that you've posted in other threads >where you claim you're "just asking a question". That just makes you look worse >than you already do. > >Did you consult with the other moderators before writing this post? > >-Peter Did I need to consult with the other moderators before asking whether or not he understood rule #4? Do I need to consult them before making any post here? Are you asking me this seriously? Maybe you might be interpreting my post wrong? (Heck no.. you are always right) Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.