Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 22:02:27 02/12/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2006 at 00:57:24, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 13, 2006 at 00:26:12, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On February 12, 2006 at 13:32:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>This is nothing more than a flagrant attempt in polling users about possible >>>commercial payment possibilities for your program, and as such I am removing the >>>thread. >>> >>>As per the charter: >>> >>>Once a member gains access to the message board, he may read all messages and >>>post new or response messages with the proviso that these new or response >>>messages: >>> >>> 1. Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess >>> 2. Are not abusive in nature >>> 3. Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others >>> 4. Are not flagrant commercial exhortations >>> 5. Are not of questionable legal status. >>> >>>What about rule #4 do you not understand? >>> >>>Peter >> >> >>So, this insulting post is your best attempt to handle the situation? Are you >>kidding me? You could have emailed Vasik directly, but I guess that would have >>robbed you of too much glory, huh? >> >>And please spare me the disingenuous crap that you've posted in other threads >>where you claim you're "just asking a question". That just makes you look worse >>than you already do. >> >>Did you consult with the other moderators before writing this post? >> >>-Peter > >Did I need to consult with the other moderators before asking whether or not he >understood rule #4? > >Do I need to consult them before making any post here? > >Are you asking me this seriously? Yes. I want to know if you acted alone. -Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.